Writing in the Hindustan Times, an alarmed Prem Shankar Jha says that given the Chinese sensitivities vis-a-vis India, "the immediate need is to persuade the Dalai Lama to postpone his visit to Tawang":

The resulting confrontation has now acquired a life of its own and is leading the two countries towards a war that neither wants. The calibrated escalation of China’s  demands and actions suggests that the point of no return will be the Dalai Lama’s visit to Tawang in November. Wen Jiabao’s request for a meeting with Manmohan Singh in Bangkok should, therefore, be seen as a last ditch effort to avert war...

Fortunately for India, reversing the escalation does not require making humiliating concessions. All that New Delhi needs to do is clear up the misapprehensions that have taken root in the Chinese leaders’ minds.

Read the full piece at the HT: It's a Dim Sum Game

Such suggestions seem to be of a piece with the recent “strategic reassurance” given by Barack obama to China by his refusal to meet the Dalai Lama during the latter's visit to Washington. While Obama may have been bestowed with a Nobel Peace Prize soon thereafter, Maureen Dowd in a recent column quoted Vaclav Havel to put it in perspective: “It is only a minor compromise. But exactly with these minor compromises start the big and dangerous ones, the real problems.”  Gabbar Singh had put it pithily in Sholay,  "jo Dar gayaa samjho mar gayaa".

 
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Oct 22, 2009 AT 06:54 IST
Comments :
Nov 01, 2009 08:20 PM
1
Jha could be right and there may be a war. but isn't it also possible that it's mere sabre-rattling by the chinese? in that case, shouldn't we stand up and call their bluff? are we condemned to be a 'soft' state for ever? also, it's effing frustrating that the indian government is even more opaque than the chinese and never explains its actions and policies to the nation ... everything is decided by a small clique, it seems.
radhanath varadan
hanoi, vietnam
Oct 26, 2009 09:11 AM
2
>If India realy believes it owns Pak-occupied Kashmir, >why did Shastri hand back the Hajji Pir Pass to the >Paks in 1965?

in hope of a permanent settlement with the horrors across the border.

territorial disputes between india and pak are on much hazier grounds than between india and china. because these peoples in the two countries were one people in one country not far too long back. so who "owns" what is not that firm because both claim territory on the same historical grounds.
nandakumar
chennai, india
Oct 26, 2009 04:13 AM
3
The Dalai Lama is an honored guest in India and a respected spiritual leader as the PM noted. The Tawang monastery is of substantial significance for Tibetans and the residents are looking forward to his visit. De facto if not de jure control of Tawang is under India; not allowing the Dalai Lama to visit will only underscore the fact that India has heretofore been a soft state, open to manipulation by one and all
vijay
New York, USA
Oct 26, 2009 02:42 AM
4
If India realy believes it owns Pak-occupied Kashmir, why did Shastri hand back the Hajji Pir Pass to the Paks in 1965?
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Oct 25, 2009 07:00 AM
5
why are all these people who advocate dialogue between china and india on arunachal, not talking about the 40,000 odd sq kms of our territory forcibly taken by the chinese during 1962? and how about the part of pok china is occupying as well?
nandakumar
chennai, india
Oct 25, 2009 06:58 AM
6
>One thing we must understand that up to 1950 Twang >was part of Tibet, when Twang megared in India that >one is controversial subject,

tawang was not part of tibet in 1950. that is precisely the point. it was part of the british empire. so when the brits left india naturally assumed control of it. tawang was part of traditional tibet - but then tibet was forcibly occupied by the chinese on dubious claims.

yes the dalia lama for whatever reason accept tibet as part of china. but again he says tawang belongs to india.
nandakumar
chennai, india
Oct 24, 2009 10:13 PM
7
A sensible message from Ramesh Raghuvanshi of Pune.
Samirajan
Portland, United States
Oct 24, 2009 08:33 PM
8
One thing we must understand that up to 1950 Twang was part of Tibet, when Twang megared in India that one is controversial subject,If Indian government and even Dalai Lama also excepted that Tibet is part of China naturally contraversy is there about Twang, it is better India and China first solve the problem of Twang, up till Dalai Lama must not visit to Twang.
Ramesh Raghuvanshi
pune, India
Oct 24, 2009 05:52 PM
9
india can carry out a mass fast against china.
Aziz Afif
Hyderabad, India
Oct 24, 2009 04:18 PM
10
Should The Dalai Lama Go to Tawang? yes he should. Not only that India should send the President Patil to Taiwan.

Also quitely convey to Bejing that there are tibetians who dont follow dalai lama and might be interested in more traditional protests, if China doest not stop funding the Maoists.
ANBanerjee
Newcastle, United Kingdom
Oct 24, 2009 02:21 PM
11
I was ashamed to read that piece by Prem Shankar Jha. Is he a citizen of rising India or does he belong to Grenada. I was in the military for 22 years andI can tell you that militarily India can easily whip China. But when India fights, the whole nation fights. Its blokes like Prem who scare the ordinary. We need bolder journalists.
D Cruz
Mumbai, India
Oct 23, 2009 03:14 PM
12
the hype necessitating a military build-up is itself intriguing. In 1999-2000 the 17th karmapa "escaped" from Lhasa to India via Nepal, and while conspiracy theories abound about that, no real stand-off happened between India and China.
its more posturing - both are rivals to claiming the status of Asian numero uno.
anu kumar
Delhi, India
Oct 23, 2009 02:47 PM
13
even with pakistan india cannot wage a decisive war now. can china wage a decisive war with india then? hardly. and chances of defeat are greater for the invading party than those defending their homes (usa in vietnam, russia in afghanistan, china in vietnam, india in srilanka etc). so china will not risk a defeat which will put an end to its superpower ambitions. too much at stake for them to risk that. they are just bullying india to see if we will blink. just hope that mms has the sense and cojones to see that. if we blink it will not end there. china will then keep putting pressure on us to yield more and more, till we give up arunachal.
nandakumar
chennai, india
Oct 23, 2009 02:31 PM
14
>He should cancel his visit to Tawang immediately and >make it easier for the PM to hold fruitful talks with >his Chinese counterpart for toning down the present >belligerent situation.

"fruitful" for the chinese only means the posession of arunachal. are we to give up that?

it is time for india to take a stand and call a spade a spade. china will lose even more than india in case of a war. and if china is defeated there are three positive things in it for india : 1. india will cease to fear china, 2. china will develop an inferiority complex and 3. it will also effectively muzzle pakistan as it cannot rely on china anymore.

will china risk all these?

i think not.
nandakumar
chennai, india
Oct 23, 2009 07:57 AM
15
Tawang is an Indian Territory and Dalai Lama must go to Tawang. Mr Jha has rocks in his head. We have too many journalists surviving on PLA's largesse. This man should be ashamed himself even to think something like this. Chinese goons undestand that Indian's try to hide their cowardice behind the veil of political corretness and Gandhian ahimsa. Don't worry Mr Jha we have a PM with a banana spine who may fulfill desire of ghatia reporter like you.
Jitendra
Melbourne, Australia
Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
   

blogs

Sundeep Dougal
RECENT TAGS
1984
26/11: Terror In Mumbai
Corruption
Elections
Faiz Ahmed Faiz
Media
poetry
Scams/Frauds/Rackets
Terror in India
Tributes
 


     
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY