For more of the video, please click on Video 2 and then follow the links from there

Karan Thapar interviews Arundhati Roy for CNN-IBN (in continuation of yesterday's news, now that the transcript and the video are available):

Karan Thapar: ...You have said earlier this week that a military solution to the Maoists' struggle is not an option. What then is the solution?

Arundhati Roy: I think the first thing would be to pull back the army and to stop this nonsense about air force will fire in self-defence and all that.

Karan Thapar: No military operations even if it includes just police and paramilitary?

Arundhati Roy: No military operations. I would say that that is going to provoke a situation.

Karan Thapar: What's the second thing?

Arundhati Roy: Then I would say that you should come out with all the MoUs that you have signed for all the mineral wealth which is really the key issue. I mean just the bauxite in Orissa is worth 4 trillion that's with 12 zeros.

Karan Thapar: Do you really believe that the dispossessed and poor in Orissa would be concerned about the MoUs signed by the Government of India, they are not aware of them.

Arundhati Roy: Are you joking? They know it better than you or me. This is what I would say – come clean, tell us what the MoUs are and the companies involved.

Karan Thapar: After coming clean, what's the next stage?

Arundhati Roy: For example, on October 12, there was supposed to be a public hearing in Lohandigura (Madhya Pradesh) where Tata is setting up a steel factory, in the name of operation "Green Hunt". There were barriers that prevented people from going there and expressing what they had to – their approvals or disapprovals.

Karan Thapar: So you are saying let people express themselves and voice their dissents?

Arundhati Roy: Let them voice their dissent, let them be at these public hearings, make all the MoUs public, remove your army and then let's see what happens.

Karan Thapar: If the Government were prepared to take your advice, would you in return go to the Maoists and say it now behooves you to also abjure your violence. If the Government is reaching out with one hand, you must return with the other. Will you take that step?

Arundhati Roy: If you are talking about me as an individual, I am nobody but I am sure there are people who would take that step. It has been done before. In the interest of the future of this country, all of us are concerned.

Karan Thapar: What you are saying is that the initiative should come from the Government first.

Arundhati Roy: I think so. There should be unconditional talks.

Read the full transcript on ibnlive.com

Also read, an earlier interview with Arundhati Roy on CNN-IBN: Govt at war with Naxals to aid MNCs: Arundhati:

For 30 years in places like Chhattisgarh, there have been Naxals. Why is the situation now being made to sound like there is this huge upsurge? The real fact is - and I believe this - that it is the Government that wants a war to clear out the forest areas because there is a huge backlog of MoUs in Jharkhand as well as Chhattisgarh that are not being activated.

Incidentally, on the same subject, Ashok Mitra, writing in the Telegraph on Friday had lamented that unlike the Dalits who were fortunate to be gifted a cult figure in Bhimrao Ambedkar, the Tribals and the adivasis have only had Naxals, and gone on to offer another useful reminder:

In this situation, the Maoists are laying their bet on the Union home minister. Were he to succeed in persuading his cabinet colleagues and party bosses that enough was enough and it was time to declare total war on the Maoists, the latter will be delighted beyond measure. They will love the civil war that will ensue, a war where the country’s army will battle against some of their own compatriots who happen to be mostly adivasis. It may even appear to the world as an ethnic war where the usurpers of power are trying to liquidate the remnants of the country’s original inhabitants.

The Union home minister, the Maoists presumably hope, will be the answer to their prayer.

 
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Oct 26, 2009 AT 22:06 IST
Comments :
Nov 03, 2009 12:15 PM
7
In my view the Maoists (mostly tribal and dispossessed people) and Taliban (mostly religiously fanatic and blinded people) are not comparable. Moists do not come to our concrete jungles and explode bombs in a bid to embrace the heaven as the Taliban do. They are protesting against the violence by the powers that be, that of evicting them from their ancestral lands unceremoniously, under the guise of development (effectively of a few). They are not questioning anyone's faith or belief. Their means may be wrong, not their cause. But both the means and cause of Taliban are not justifiable.

As for the funds with which they function and survive, it is easy to understand. For instance, Rs.50000 Cr. stamp scam, 40% of NREGA fund, Rs.50000 Cr. Telecom scam, the immeasureable hawala money, other corrupt deals worth billions of rupees, etc. A fraction of all these illegal deals is more than enough for terrorist and maoist elements to survive for more than a centure ahead. As these transactions are taking place illegaly, ofcourse under the protection and blessings of many of our corrupt netas, a major chunk leak mid-way and reach these forces.
KVSKumar
Mumbai, India
Oct 31, 2009 08:21 AM
6
Instead of searching for the reasons why the Maoists are killing the innocent people or why the Taliban is doing a similar sinister acts it necessary to understand who funds and arm these bad guys.
The once formed outfit to protect the interests o the poor peasants from the atrocities and exploitations of rich and feudal landlords today transformed into a semi mercenary and an elite gang of extortionists.They now have political ambitions but to rule through the gun point and not through democratic process.
vijay
Bangalore, India
Oct 30, 2009 09:11 AM
5
Great. I need to buy a gun now and start randomly shooting people and seems like I will get "Unconditional Talks" from the Government. We should probably teach this in school I guess.. Maybe Ms Roy can prepare that curriculam...
Ragesh
Portland, United States
Oct 27, 2009 01:47 PM
4
Chdambaram should break the financial spine of the Maoists.All the money to the Maoists flows from the Christian organisations,just like it happened in Nepal.The moment the Hindu monarchy was removed ,there has been frentic church building activities there.All the Hindu faces of the Maoists are puppets of the Christian missionaries.Not for nothing a fanatical Christian,Arundhati Roy supports the Maoists.
S.S.Nagaraj
Bangalore, India
Oct 27, 2009 02:59 AM
3
Arundhati Roy is partially correct in her assessment. It's not about Maoists, it's about Tribals.

The fact of the matter is, the govt. (any govt. for that matter) has done nothing to educate the tribals so as to give them a fighting chance to survive in a modern world. All the govt. has done so far is provided them with some free rice in the name of Jawahar Rojgar Yojana or some Yojana named after someone from the Gandhi family. That is not any initiative to develop people. That's like giving alms to beggars.

What Chidambaram is doing is using state machinery to displace the tribals so that they can use their land for mining, factories, steel plants etc. There is nothing wrong in developing the steel plants. The wrong is in not taking enough steps to educate the tribals so that they can get a job in those steel plants. That's the first thing the Indian govt. should have done. They should have built vocational schools to train the tribals so as to make them ready for industrialization.

The tribals are partially responsible for their condition. They need to do away with their past way of living and try to modernize themselves. Guns is not the solution for survival, education is. However, both the govt and the tribals took the easy root to take their case to the next step. And that is through violence. The govt. started the violence by engaging the police. Now they are engaged in state sponsored terrorism.
Raj
Chicago, United States
Oct 27, 2009 02:56 AM
2
Great. Now that Arundhati has come out on the side of Maoists and against the Congress government, it will be interesting how all pro-Congress English media is going to react toward Arundhati. It is already obvious from the kind of questions asked by Mr. Thaper which shows that he does not agree with her. Compare that to the time Arundhati was attacking BJP.
This reminds me that in the eyes of Western media Aundhati was a hero until she started speaking against Iraq and Afghanistan wars and all of a sudden she became a Communist and fascist in their eyes.
P.B. Joshipura
Suffolk, Virginia, United States
Oct 26, 2009 10:56 PM
1
Do we give audience to Prof Hafiz Saed an ideologue who churns jihadi killing machines through hsi preachings.. if not then why are we givign audience to Arundhatis and ilk who creat maisit killign machine through their preachings..

Why this special treatment to murderer of maoist hue.
Anil Kumar
Toronto, Canada
Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
   

blogs

Sundeep Dougal
RECENT TAGS
Amitabh Bachchan
Australia
Bal Thackeray
Books
Free Speech
Indians Abroad
J.D. Salinger
Maharashtra
Media
Migrants-Outsiders
Mumbai
Outlook
Pakistan
Shah Rukh Khan
Tributes
Uddhav Thackeray
 


     
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY