It is assumed, that having a well paying job, having a beautiful, good wife, and other considerations makes a man responsible. This is the most insane thing that I have heard. If a person looses his job, he isn't irresponsible, and if according to the Indian law, one has a registered marriage, and then annuls it with divorce, one is not showing responsibility. In Hinduism, this is unthinkable, divorce. Because certain five gentlemen were married to the same lady, by a person who is supposed to be God, should divorce be allowed, because people take oath on the Bhagwad Gita, in court? I know this person to be God. 

  Mr. Kejriwal perhaps feels guilty, like other people did, in parliament, that he was supposed to be a member of Indian society, in the past, and is a member in the present, and people like him will be in the future. I would rather, since you have taken the responsibilty, to carry it out, but perhaps, better. It seems obvious, that Mr. Kejriwal should not enter politics. He will also be in your position. I have been very, very severe, without using any unusual verbs, nouns, pronouns, etc., and it seems so to me, in my previous post. I seem to have used the word, class, as some use the word, caste. And, you have accepted it, perhaps, this insinuation, unknown to me. Please do not spread disharmony, where respected people like Mr. Hazare and Ramdevji, feel that they need to call the government, corrupt.

 When I mentioned Salman Khurshid's society, I meant his class society, not his religious society, because I didn't need to mention this.

  One wonders, what Salman Khurshid is trying to promote as law minister, and socially, as a representative of the people. It is o. k., for a woman to have casual sex, but wrong if a Dalit lady has forced sex, with an upper caste person. Salman Khurshid is a married person, and he does not represent, what social changes his parliament seem to be the harbinger of. His vote bank is Muslim, also. I don't think his society is more decent than Dalit society. Dalit society is not bad in any way. If I did what he is doing, I would call myself unreasonable, and perhaps others would call me insane. People just look at him with derision, perhaps, but not me. I know for a fact, that when you are in parliament, you have assumed certain responsibilities. It is very good for people to say you are corrupt, but you aren't. You didn't need to come to parliament, to make a living, a decent living. Why don't you tell the Dalits, that having a small house is very good, because they can keep it very clean, themselves, and having their own well, is even better, if it is very clean? The upper caste person will respect this, and even then feel it not right to drink water from your well, only because it is yours? Does Mayawati want Dalits to become like the 'Upper Castes', because casual sex will not be forced sex? I can say with a conscience, that all the parties in parliament are promoting what is not good, perhaps parliament does not promote good, and I really hope not, because parliament then shouldn't be, as it is now. 

 CAG, Judiciary and even the pressure groups like Team Anna have overplayed their hand.  CAG is coming up with presumptive loss, Judiciary tells what do in Naxal areas and Anna Hazare and co want to bring Jan  Lokpal from the steets. No one cares about the national interest. At this time, the arrival of Walmart looks like the arrival of East India company.