POSTED BY Buzz ON May 30, 2012 AT 23:44 IST ,  Edited At: May 30, 2012 23:44 IST

As the Chief of Army Staff General V.K. Singh gets ready to hand over charge to Lt. General Bikram Singh, Outlook's cover story of last year is back to haunt the defence establishment.

In August 2011, Outlook reported on an army court of inquiry (CoI) involving 12 officers and 39 soldiers to verify whether they were guilty of sexual misconduct during their year-long stint, beginning January 2008, in Congo.

Our story then had gone on to point out:

The CoI could prove a tricky issue for the army, as the UN mission in Congo was also commanded by Lt Gen Bikram Singh, the seniormost general in the line of succession to current chief Gen V.K. Singh. If instances of sexual misconduct are found to have occurred during his tenure there, it could become a major blot on his record.

The government had on March 3 announced the appointment of Lt Gen Bikram Singh as the next Army chief.

The Supreme Court later, in April, dismissed a petition questioning the elevation of Lt Gen Bikram Singh as the successor to chief of army staff General VK Singh. 

Writing then on the petition, Outlook had pointed out:

The petitioners have also questioned Bikram Singh’s suitability to lead the army in the light of his alleged involvement in a fake encounter circa 2001 to “gain personal advantage”. Seventy-year-old Abdullah Bhat, a civilian from Anantnag, was killed in that encounter and later branded as a foreign militant. His relatives, who have filed a petition in the high court, have alleged that the fake encounter was conducted by then brigadier Bikram Singh and that it was hushed up at his instance by the Army HQ. The case is currently before the J&K High Court. The MoD’s stand was that an internal enquiry had cleared his name. But strangely the details of this enquiry report have not been provided in response to Rathi’s RTI application.

The petitioners yesterday sought review of the Supreme Court’s order, contending that the centre had obtained the court order by "misrepresenting" facts.

Read Full Post  |  2 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON May 30, 2012 AT 23:44 IST, Edited At: May 30, 2012 23:44 IST
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Apr 04, 2012 AT 20:53 IST ,  Edited At: Apr 05, 2012 01:11 IST

On March 13, rediff.com carried what seemed then to have been an innocuous story,India's elite paratroopers meet their match in fog, traffic during mockup, which talked about the elite Parachute Brigade of the Indian army, based in Agra playing out two different scenarios depicting " the need for a quick operation almost akin to the situations that obtained in Maldives last month and the consequences of the mutiny by the Bangladesh Rifles (now Border Guards, Bangladesh) two years ago:

During the exercise, elements of the brigade travelled by road from Agra to Delhi to link up with the Indian Air Force base at Hindon on the outskirts of the capital, since the recently acquired medium lift transport aircraft, the C-130 Js are stationed there.

Army itself held an official briefing on the subject two days after that—on March 15, 2012—in Agra.

***

But the innocuous story (along with another instance of troop movements towards Delhi on the same day) found itself featuring in a three-deck, four-byline, eight-column banner headline by the Indian Express today— The January night Raisina Hill was spooked: Two key Army units moved towards Delhi without notifying Govt— to a full front-page story that was authored by none other than the paper’s editor-in-chief Shekhar Gupta, jointly with Ritu Sarin, Pranab Dhal Samanta and Ajmer Singh, which, inter alia, also went on to state: 

Nobody is using the “C” word to imply anything other than “curious”. All else is considered an impossibility.


Read Full Post  |  19 comments
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Apr 04, 2012 AT 20:53 IST, Edited At: Apr 05, 2012 01:11 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Mar 28, 2012 AT 22:54 IST ,  Edited At: Mar 28, 2012 22:54 IST

It started with an interview to the Hindu, published on March 26, 2012, with Army Chief, General V.K. Singh alleging he was offered a bribe of Rs. 14 crore and that he had told the defence ministry about it:

The General said the lobbyist offered him the bribe in order to have a tranche of 600 sub-standard vehicles of a particular make cleared for purchase. He said the vehicles, 7,000 of which were already in use in the Army, had been sold over the years at exorbitant prices with no questions asked. He said there was no proper facility where they could be serviced and maintained and yet they continued to be sold to the Army: “Just imagine, one of these men had the gumption to walk up to me and tell me that if I cleared the tranche, he would give me Rs. 14 crore. He was offering a bribe to me, to the Army Chief. He told me that people had taken money before me and they will take money after me.”

The Army chief said the brazenness of the act shocked him out of his wits. “I was shocked. If somebody comes and tells you, you will get so much, what can you do?” He said the man had recently retired from the Army, indicating how deeply entrenched the problem was.

The General said he went straight to Mr. Antony and reported the matter. “I told him, if you think I'm a misfit, I will walk out.” ...


Read Full Post  |  16 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Mar 28, 2012 AT 22:54 IST, Edited At: Mar 28, 2012 22:54 IST
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Nov 02, 2010 AT 23:59 IST ,  Edited At: Nov 03, 2010 01:28 IST


Cartoon by: Sundeep Adhwaryu

The real tragedy in the Adarsh Housing Society scam in Mumbai is not that land earmarked for a six-storey building of apartments for disabled veterans, war widows and heroes of Kargil was used, in contravention of zoning laws and environmental regulations, for a 31-storey luxury high-rise, out of whose 103 apartments, only three went to families connected to the Kargil conflict, and the remainder went to two retired army chiefs, a former naval chief, four other army officers who went on to become generals, relatives of ministers and top netas and babus.

The real tragedy is not that it involves top officers of the defence establishment who got  themselves flats allotted in a building made on land purportedly sanctioned in the name of Kargil widows and heroes.

The real tragedy is not that the 31-storeyed building could provide a potential threat a vantage point over the navy’s air station, INS Shikra, just a kilometre away aerially.

The real tragedy is not that the Chief Minister of Maharashtra, after first brazening it out about his 'distant relatives' — his mother in law, among others — and then offering to return the flats and resign, continues to hold on to his post like a limpet.

The real tragedy is not that the Congress does not know who to replace him with since almost all other big names in contention in Maharashtra Congress are equally tainted  (Prithvirak Chauhan and Mukul Wasnik's names are still being talked about)

The real tragedy is not that the silence of the Prime Minister and the Congress President is deafeningly loud and that their fabled 'voice of conscience' is muted or that they are hiding behind the shield of 'due process' in sacking the incumbent CM of Maharashtra, whose involvement in other bigger scams has since come to light.

The real tragedy is not that sycophancy ruled, or that Suresh Kalmadi, accused in the CWG scam, and Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan were among those present, at the AICC meet today where not a word was uttered about any of these scams, while the big honchos held forth on everything else under the sun, from RSS involvement in terror plots to the situation in J&K  or that A. Raja, accused in the spectrum scam, continues to be a minister in UPA.

The real tragedy for the ruling government is not just that the various "people in opposition" said to be involved in the Adarsh scam are now with the Congress (Narayan Rane) or UPA (T.R. Baalu).  The last elections when Congress bank-rolled the MNS to win, along with NCP, had removed all the vestiges and veneer of respectibility from the so-called 'secular' front and was more a commentary on the state of the decrepit 'communal' opposition -- at the state and at the centre.

All that — and much more — is a given. All that is tragic enough. All that is something that does not shock or scandalise us any more. All that is something we are all inured against.

The real tragedy is that after so many days, of scandalous after scandalous details hitting the headlines, nobody believes that the guilty would ever be brought to book or be meted out any justice — or even that there could be an independent enquiry to bring out the truth.

Which police officer indeed would lodge an FIR against the CM of Maharashtra?  Or powerful ministers and well-connected babus and officers?

Indeed, given the political rigor mortis in the present UPA, there seems to be no effective systemic response available. Though CBI is said to be investigating the case, nobody quite knows what it is investigating and nobody frankly has any expectations from its "investigations".

The Congress says its top ministers are investigating the matter. It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic. It is not a matter involving the Congress party's personal property that its trouble shooters — Pranab Mukherjee and St Antony — will do the 'investigation' and then solve it all by simply issuing a firmaan naming who should replace Sri Chavan once Sri Obama has been received and shown around Mumbai.

It is possible, though by no means certain, that the more disciplined defence establishment might actually end up taking some action after a court of inquiry, but what about the civilians — netas and babus and assorted fixers?

It is a clear case requiring criminal prosecution but as Arvind Kejriwal points out in today's TOI, in the context of the CWG,  the anti-corruption laws and systems suffer from internal contradictions — the CVC is independent but merely an advisory body, with no jurisdiction over politicians, lacking any powers to take action. And the CBI, which has the power to take action, as stated earlier, is seen to be the government's handmaiden and carries no credibility: Kejriwal goes on to say:

The government has announced the setting up of yet another agency called the Lokpal by December. Again, the government is playing dirty. According to its proposal, the Lokpal would have jurisdiction over politicians but not bureaucrats, as if the two indulge in corruption separately. So, almost every case will be investigated by both the CVC and the Lokpal; the former will look into the role of bureaucrats and the latter will look into the role of politicians. The obvious question is, why can't the same agency investigate both? And the most interesting part is that even the Lokpal is being made an advisory body. It would merely recommend to the government to initiate prosecution against, say, some of its ministers. Is it likely the government would ever do that?

It is time that the media focussed on the critical issues afflicting our anti-corruption systems. Let the media say that unless these deficiencies are addressed, no agency is capable of doing an honest and effective investigation. All of them should be merged into one single agency, the Lokpal. Give it jurisdiction over both bureaucrats and politicians. Give it comprehensive powers to investigate and prosecute the guilty without needing any permission. [Read the full piece at the TOI]

Also Read: an earlier article in Outlook by Arvind Kejriwal

Does any of this even seem feasible? Never mind the war of words between the two political parties, what do you think should be done in this case? Even if all the illegal allotments are cancelled and the building, as has been variously suggested, is razed or sold or converted into a trust for the war widows and heroes, do you think any of those behind the scam would receive any punishment? Should they not? What do you suggest?

Read Full Post  |  80 comments
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Nov 02, 2010 AT 23:59 IST, Edited At: Nov 03, 2010 01:28 IST
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Oct 31, 2010 AT 02:58 IST ,  Edited At: Oct 31, 2010 05:28 IST

Vir Sanghvi in the New Indian Express asks how can one be hopeful about a society where all those we put our faith in, from sports officials to chiefs of defence staff, have no hesitation in stealing from us:

The most shocking thing about the Adarsh Society scam is that the corrupt promoters were able to buy off everybody they dealt with by offering them flats in the building. Regional commanders, defence chiefs, local collectors, revenue ministers, government officials, etc — anybody who had any role in clearing the project got something out of it.

Many of these people represented the cream of Indian society — senior military officers, IAS civil servants and the like — and yet, the scamsters seem to have encountered a minimum of resistance. Almost everybody was only too willing to be bought.

So, where are the good guys? Has our society reached the stage where the good guys have all given up on being good and  decided that because the system is beyond repair, they might as well join the bad guys and get something for themselves?

More here

 

Read Full Post  |  18 comments
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Oct 31, 2010 AT 02:58 IST, Edited At: Oct 31, 2010 05:28 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Apr 12, 2010 AT 23:59 IST ,  Edited At: Apr 13, 2010 00:51 IST

That there are differences in the Congress party over how to handle the Maoist/Naxal insurgency is not a secret. But the recent flurry of public statements and press-releases have Delhi's gossip circles abuzz about how the PM and the home minister on the one hand and the Congress President Sonia Gandhi and her son, Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi, on the other, are not on the same page regarding the strategy to be adopted against the Maoists/Naxals. That the BJP firmly backed the home minister adds further grist to the mills.

Exhibit 1: No statements from Gandhis 

As R. Jagannathan put it in the DNA:

Given the extremely secretive nature of the Manmohan Singh-Sonia-Rahul Gandhi interface, it is not possible to conclusively prove this, but it is reasonable to presume that Sonia is not actively backing the government in its anti-Maoist campaign.

We certainly haven’t heard a single Sonia statement on Maoism that backs the official stand of her government. At best we have had non-descript statements deploring violence — something similar to what the human-rightswallahs mumble when confronted with the latest Maoist atrocities. In her last statement before the Jharkhand polls, Sonia said “there is no place for violence in a democracy” — a motherhood statement at best. Her son Rahul blamed non-Congress governments for the Maoist violence, neatly deflecting the issue. More here

Exhibit 2: Controversy over public statements by the service chiefs

Take the recent controversy over whether or not the Army and Air Force chiefs should be making public statements (or airing personal views) about the advisability or otherwise of using the defence forces in anti-insurgency operations against the Maoists. 

For instance, as a well-argued blog-post points out:

All decisions related to employment of security forces — whether internally or externally — are political decisions, taken after inputs of all government agencies and executed by the security forces of the State. When service chiefs speak out of turn publicly — even unintentionally — they sway public opinion and constrain the government in its decision making. Thus, it is often considered imprudent for the service chiefs to express themselves publicly and unduly influence the political decision-making process of the government.

Under Mr. Antony’s watch as the Defence Minister — starting from the Pay commission fracas, one-rank-one-pension issue, and recently the Sukhna land controversy — the civil-military relations in the country have come under a great strain. It must be said that Mr. Antony seems to be singularly incapable of maintaining this delicate balance of civil-military relations. Mr. Antony has no choice now but to read out the riot act to the service chiefs so that these mistakes are not repeated. More here

However, in Byzantine Delhi, conspiracy theorists point out that the very fact that such statements from the service chiefs have been made -- and particularly that they have not  been one-off occurrences but are being repeated -- means that they have the go-ahead from civilian authority (read Defence Minister). 

The Defence Minister is of course considered a Gandhi family loyalist. 

Exhibit 3: The Home Ministry Statements

Earlier, the army chief's statement that "internal deficiencies, which may be in their training or some other things" had led to the Dantewada massacre was joined issue with by the home minister and his ministry. While the home minister said, "please do not be disrespectful to the jawans. Please do not be disrespectful to our forces", his ministry came out with a release saying, "The Army has trained 10 Battalions of CRPF, 10 Battalions of BSF and 5 Battalions of ITBP prior to their induction in naxal-affected States.

Exhibit 4:  The Cabinet Secretary's Note

Cabinet Secretary K M Chandrashekhar is said to have written to all Ministers and Secretaries on Saturday making it clear that only the Home Ministry would speak on internal security issues as it is the nodal ministry. Not that it stopped the IAF chief from once again expressing his "personal views" today.

 

Read Full Post  |  63 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Apr 12, 2010 AT 23:59 IST, Edited At: Apr 13, 2010 00:51 IST
POSTED BY Sundeep ON May 10, 2009 AT 04:07 IST ,  Edited At: May 10, 2009 04:44 IST

Arundhati Roy in the Dawn:

Is there a threat of Talibanisation engulfing the entire region?I think it has already engulfed our region. I think there’s a need for a very clear thinking (on this issue of Talibanisation). In India, there are two kinds of terrorism: one is Islamic terrorism and the other Maoist terrorism. But this term terrorism, we must ask, what do they mean by it. In Pakistan, I’m here to understand what they mean by this term. When we say we must fight the Taliban or must defeat them, what does it mean? I’m here to understand what you mean when you say Taliban. Do you mean a militant? Do you mean an ideology? Exactly what is it that is being fought? That needs to be clarified.

More here

Read Full Post  |  25 comments
POSTED BY Sundeep ON May 10, 2009 AT 04:07 IST, Edited At: May 10, 2009 04:44 IST
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Mar 11, 2009 AT 17:08 IST ,  Edited At: Mar 11, 2009 17:22 IST

An Israeli arms dealer, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, apparently decided to spice up their presentation at Aero India 2009, organized by the Ministry of Defence.

Saurabh Joshi of the Defense and Strategic Affairs Online News Magazine, StratPost, which uploaded the video on youtube, thought it was "innovative video marketing".

But Stephen Trimble of The Dew Line seems to have got it right. Describing it as "catastrophic collision of Bollywood and the arms industry,"  he went on to say, "No introduction by me can give justice to this attempt at arms marketing ...Just watch, and, if you're able, immediately erase the awful tune from your brain."

Yes, indeed, it is difficult. It left the Wired's Danger Room blogger Noah Shactman frothing at the mouth. Clearly, he speaks for all of us:

we may have just found the most atrocious defense video of all time, just days into the Iron Eagles — our celebration of the awesomely bad videos of the military-industrial complex. Trust me, Slumdog Millionaire it ain't...

Every element of the promotional film is just plain wrong. The sari-clad, "Indian" dancers look all too ashkenaz and zaftig. The unshaven, hawk-nosed, leather-clad leading man appears to be a refugee from You Don't Mess With the Zohan. Then of course, there's the implication that the Indian military is somehow like a helpless woman who "need(s) to feel safe and sheltered."

But for my rupees, the worst thing about the video is the damn theme song they've concocted for the thing. To pimp its weapons, Rafael produced a sitar-heavy twist on Rick Astley's love letter to Satan, "Together Forever," complete with a new chorus: "Dinga dinga, dinga dinga, dinga dinga, dinga dinga dee." The rest of us now have to suffer for that bad, bad choice.

Full Wired post is here: Iron Eagle Nominee: Israeli Armsdog-Millionaires Assault Bollywood, Good Taste

Hat tip: Priyamvada Gopal

Read Full Post  |  3 comments
POSTED BY Sundeep ON Mar 11, 2009 AT 17:08 IST, Edited At: Mar 11, 2009 17:22 IST
     
 
Short Takes
recent tags
Angelina Jolie
BJP
Congress
Copyrights - Intellectual Property Rights - Patents
Cricket - Match & Spot Fixing
Cricket - IPL
Genetics- Genes- DNA- etc
Health- Medicine- Fitness
NDA
Pratap Bhanu Mehta
Rahul Dravid
S. Sreesanth
Third Front
UPA
 
bloggers
A. Sanzgiri
Boria Majumdar
Buzz
Dr Mohammad Taqi
Freya Dasgupta
G. Rajaraman
K.V. Bapa Rao
Namrata Joshi
News Ed
Omar Ali
Our Readers Write Back
Prarthna Gahilote
Shefalee Vasudev
Sundeep Dougal
ARCHIVES
Go
SMTWTFS
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
recent comments


ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: